It's Called Defense, Morons, and We'll Show You How To Play It
"No Man's Land is pocketmarked like the body of foulest disease and its odour is the breath of cancer...No Man's Land under snow is like the face of the moon, chaotic, crater-ridden, uninhabitable, awful, the abode of madness. Hideous landscapes, vile noises....everything unnatural, broken, blastered; the distortion of the dead, whose unburiable bodies sit outside the dug-outs all day, all night, the most execrable sights on earth."
- Wilfred Owen
I want to make one thing clear: I had a damn good time watching Ohio State and Penn State trade blows on Saturday from my nosebleed seats in the south stands. It was a game that -- as one associate poignantly observed -- was almost exclusively played between the 30 yard lines: turning the redzone into a literal no man's land: an estuary of frozen turf blades, naked shadows, and the cool distant crunches of pads popping at midfield. It was a phantom desert -- a negative tour de force that would make a British war poet proud.
I ripped my vocal chords out screaming, pulled a courtesy hand towel into threads out of nervous contentment, and in the end, was strangely satisfied. Yeah, I'm a Buckeye. And I enjoyed a freaking great football game.
Saturday's heavyweight bout was a fight to the finish. For some conferences, that means the 8:00 minute mark in the first quarter.
You can imagine my surprise then, when I woke up the next day to discover some members of the mainstream media had a slightly different take.
Graham already knocked the snot of out Rivals.com "Senior" (high-school, maybe?) Writer Tom Dienhart, and his silly, little, unsupported tantrum ""Penn State Assumes Undeserved Role as Contender."
But Dienhart wasn't the only one to dismiss the Big 10 for its allegedly vanilla play. Chris Dufresne at the Los Angeles Times summed the anti-Midwest sentiment up in his "Big Ten is in a Boring State" feature.
Calling Saturday's simmering stalemate "boring" is like calling chess dull because you don't understand how it's played. You see hands lifting pieces a few squares at a time, I see a decisive, tactical, mind-game with shifting spurs of error and advantage.
Fortunately, not all members of the media are shallow. As Mark Blaudschum at The Boston Globe offered "The Nittany Lions' win in Columbus was an old-fashioned turf war, with defense dominating, a refreshing change of pace from the point-a-minute production we are seeing in some Top 25 games."
It's called defense, and it's what makes college football frustrating, complex, and spectacular.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
Sadly, as the old axiom: offense sells tickets, defense wins championships; applies here. You’d think that sports journalists would appreciate impressive efforts on either side of the ball, but apparently when that defensive effort is in the Big 10 it’s “boring” (or insert another clever description).
by Estrada on Oct 28, 2008 11:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
offense sells tickets, defense wins championships; applies here.
I doubt it. In 2002, was the stadium empty at the end of the year? Were people going “ho hum, the Buckeyes, we don’t want to see them?” Few thought the Buckeyes would win (except, y’know, people who actually understand the game), but no one thought they were ‘boring.’
I think the proper axiom is “defense wins championships, and offense is for moron sportswriters who haven’t figured out that football isn’t the same as baseball.”
See, the biggest problem is that sportswriters look at this game, and say “Oh. It’s the same kind of game as the Mississippi State-Auburn game, where the offenses sucked.” Except, of course, the two games had nothing in common: the PSU-OSU game had a total of one 3-and-out between both teams, only two turnovers (one that really mattered), only 8 drives for PSU (9 for OSU) and was, in general “start at your own 20-30, gain 20-30 yards, be stopped, punt, and put the other team in the same spot.”
The MSU/Auburn game had 16 drives, more 3-and-outs than I care to count, 4 turnovers, and was a game where the defense was the only competent unit on either side. And yet, I’m positive that some sportswriter will compare the two games that had nothing to do with each other.
I don’t know why it’s so hard for sportswriters to realize that football is, y’know, a complicated game, and just because there wasn’t a touchdown for 3 quarters doesn’t mean the game wasn’t well played.
To be honest, this game wasn’t even a “total defensive struggle.” Penn State’s offense consistently moved the ball 20-30 yards. They couldn’t move it 80 yards, true. But here’s Ohio State’s starting field position after a punt: OSU 20, OSU 12, OSU 3, OSU 8, OSU 28. Think that had anything to do with Ohio State’s inability to score points?
This was one of the games where “offense = other team doesn’t score” rather than “offense = you score.” But that subtlety seems to be constantly lost on the national media, and quite a few fans.
by Bleed Blue 'n White on Oct 28, 2008 9:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Best Game I've Ever Been To
Being a PSU fan, this was hands down the best game I’ve ever been to. I love a good old fashioned defensive slugfest, and that’s what I got. The fact that some of the media and fans haven’t seen defense before(someone from LA talking about this game? They wouldn’t understand. The Pac-10 hasn’t seen defense in years) doesn’t take anything away from this game. It was really a refreshing type of game from the other kinds of games that have been played this season.
by PizzaDelivery on Oct 28, 2008 12:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well duh...
To echo Estrada’s words, defense wins games. Sorry this wasn’t like the National Championship between USC and Texas where ever trip down the field resulted in a touchdown. That, to me, is boring. Watching a slugfest where you don’t know until the last seconds tick off the clock in the 4th quarter who’s going to win- that is an exciting, interesting game. And far from boring.
Joe Paterno is my adopted grandfather.
Nittany Lion Love,
Meredith
by PaternosGranddaughter on Oct 28, 2008 4:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
love the wilfred owen quote at the beginning......
in connection with my beloved Lions (and by extension, likening last week’s game to the hell that was Ypres, Passchaendale, the Somme and Verdun…for much of the game I was in a slight case of ‘shell-shock’). It certainly seemed like the Mark Rubin was going ‘over the top’ in the best tradition of the West Country Yeomanry and the D-lin was slogging away in the hold-heavy trenches. It is always difficult though, to reference warfare in connection with football even though the terminology and nature of the sport lends itself so easily to the field of combat. I used some Churchill quotes after the Fall of France in reference to the “monstrous tyranny” I believed Michigan football was and was pilloried by some as the next Kellen Winslow. But in a sport where hyperbole is tossed around as casually as a ball is in a Switzer’s Sooner team, I see no problem. Here’s a little something for the Hawkeyes week after next, adapted from Lt. Col. John McCrae’s equally tragic work on the Great War….
“In Kinnick’s Fields the poppy’s blow
Between the Hawkeyes row on row
That mark the progess, as if by blade
The rampaging Lion’s defense made”
hopes Maybin wipes his ass with some TP
by conquering lion in the 215 on Oct 30, 2008 10:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
A "Happy" and a "Crappy"
Often, to begin our conference calls on an unnamed fall campaign, we begin by listing our “happies” and “crappies”: the good and bad things that happened that week.
In that spirit, my “Happy” goes to LawBuckeye, who as usual astutely reveals a deep understanding of the game of football and a deeper passion for its true heritage. Let’s not forget, the game was invented in the fields of Northeast Ohio and Western Pennsylvania. I can think of no two teams with stronger claims to having played a football game in the truest sense than Ohio State and Penn State a fortnight ago.
The “Crappy” goes to Bleed Blue ‘n White. Just as football purists will offer you strong defenses of “Tresselball” (focus on defense and field position), baseball purists will extol the virtue “smallball”: timely hitting, sound pitching, and defense, defense, defense. The steroid era’s inflated numbers only prove the point, and the game is better for attempting a return to its roots.
If you want to pick on a sport for being dumbed down to pure offense, direct your ire to LeBron James and the NBA.
by lakeeriemonstar on Nov 2, 2008 11:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 









