What to Do With Terrelle the Terrible
- Can't throw a short spiral to save his life. Result? More incomplete passes out of the backfield than I care to count.
- Hooks his arm release like a tournament fisherman trying to jerk a bass out of the water, only in reverse. Result? Pegs the ball at the ground, forcing receivers to dive or "touch their toes" to pick up the ball. Dramatically limits yard pickup after the catch.
- Can't lead his receivers on middle routes. Result? Incomplete/broken up passes. Interceptions.
- Doesn't adjust his "snap" on his release for the speed and length of the throw. Result? More turf bullets than I care to count.
- Stares at his chosen receiver like a teenage boy ogling cleavage. Result? Linebackers have an easy time keying in on and jumping routes.
- Stands in the pocket for too long checking off multiple receivers. Hesitates to take off on the ground. Result? Gets beat to the sideline by outside linebackers. Routinely tackled close to the line of scrimmage on scrambles.
- Throws lazy deep balls (a.k.a. "arm punts" Hat Tip: BSD) into double-coverage. Result? Allows free safeties ample time to close and make a play.
- Pounds the turf in frustration after sacks. Hangs his head on the sidelines. Allows the game to get to him. Result? Interferes with the "muscle memory" component of mechanics making it difficult for Pryor to replicate what he did in practice during live play. Makes it difficult to recover from mistakes as a game progresses.
The combination of these raw tendencies and others has seen a signature talent devolve into a scarecrow. Don't delude yourself. Pryor is getting worse every week. The question now is what to do about it.
Let me start by saying what Jim Tressel shouldn't do. He shouldn't bench Pryor.
Don't get me wrong. Pryor should have seen the bench on Saturday against Purdue -- probably after he threw his second interception of the day at the 6:38 minute mark of the Third Quarter. Just as Rich Rodriguez substituted Denard Robinson for Tate Forcier in the fourth quarter against Iowa last week to provide an elusive "spark," a backup's presence can sometimes be a tabula rosa for a struggling offense. At the very least handing Joe Bauserman the reins for a series of two might have disrupted the Boilermaker's defensive flow, resulted in a few completions, and opened up the ground lanes for a greater rushing presence. It also might have given Pryor a chance to exorcise his demons on the sideline.
(As a short aside, Tressel needs to watch Cincinnati's Brian Kelly for cues on how to treat a struggling quarterback when he comes off the field. Pull his face mask to get his attention, tell him what he did wrong, tell him he's not going to do it again, and provide instructions on what to do instead. Make the episode a visible reprimand. Make the player mad at you instead of himself. He'll come out of the gate on the next series like a damn grizzly bear).
Still, although Tressel should have turned to Bauserman in the midst of the meltdown, he should not make him the starter next week against Minnesota. To do so would be to shoot the arthritic remains of the Ohio State offense in the foot. As Ken Gordon of The Columbus Dispatch reminds us, although Pryor is one big fat piece of the pie, he's not the entire problem.
The next biggest concern, as I see it, is the play of the offensive line. [C]learly, the line was a disaster, and there are three sophomores starting -- all big time recruits: Mike Adams, Mike Brewster and J.B. Shugarts.
What does all this say? That the recruits are all busts, all of them? Really? That they aren't getting the proper coaching? That they just had a bad day?
I believe the truth lies somewhere between bad coaching and bad day.
Coaching must be faulted to some extent. The staff had all offseason to determine what system would best suit Pryor's abilities. They came up with a pro style, run-based attack....then scrapped that after three games. All that offseason analysis -- five assistant coaches working at least 40-hour weeks for eight months, that's about 7,000 hours of work, for what?
The line appeared to be rejuvenated a few weeks ago when OSU went to the shotgun, zone-read offense. But when teams started putting serious heat on the past two weeks, they melted like wax figures.
The Buckeyes are burdened by a bad line that can't pass protect. It's easy to forget in the midst of bad throws and short scrambles how many times Pryor has to evade one, even two rushers to buy himself the time to look up field.
Imagine what that offense would look like with a young, lead-footed, pocket passer at the helm. Oh yeah, we tried that already. Todd Boeckman, anyone?
For better or worse we're stuck with Pryor. So what should Tressel do?
Consider this:
[T]he only time Pryor has looked comfortable the past two weeks was in running the hurry-up, two-minute drill. OSU scored three times in its past four possessions in the hurry-up.
But can you do that all game? Should the Buckeyes turn into Texas Tech, since that appears to be the only system in which its QB can thrive?
No, we shouldn't turn into Texas Tech exactly, but -- as a local sports radio commentator suggested yesterday -- we should model the offense after another successful program plagued with an elusive quarterback with a bum arm: Texas' 2005 National Championship squad.
To compensate for Vince Young's poor decision-making, and limited football smarts, Mack Brown installed an ultimatum offense so easy anyone could run it. It worked as follows:
- Operate out of a five-wide receiver formation.
- Have Vince pick one receiver as his lone target in the huddle.
- After the snap, have Vince read his primary receiver. If the receiver is open, make the throw. If the receiver isn't open, run.
It's that simple. Pryor should be coached to run like hell the second he smells something fishy. Sure, it might not turn him into a Sunday starting signal caller. But, does anyone really think he's got a chance of quarterbacking at the next level?
Maintain the kid's confidence, and give the offense the best chance of success. It's not the only choice, but it's the smartest one.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
Arm Punts
Love, BSD readers
We are gonna shock them with 5,000 mega watts of raw ROO POWER.
by psuwxman on Oct 19, 2009 7:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Excellent article though.
We are gonna shock them with 5,000 mega watts of raw ROO POWER.
by psuwxman on Oct 19, 2009 7:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is Tressel man enough to play that way? Not saying he shouldn’t, but he’d be selling his soul (system) for his Vince Young.
by txhawkeye on Oct 19, 2009 8:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think Tressel is man enough to change his system.
FIRE BRUCE BOCHY NOW!!!!!!
AND TAKE BRIAN SABEAN WITH HIM!!!!!
by 49er16 on Oct 19, 2009 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent post, will be duly linked at MotSaG.
I truly feel a bomb needs to be dropped on the depth chart. Starting today, all positions (except RB) is open to competition. Adapt schemes to Pryor. Split him out wide. Run the wildcat with Saine. So many options. Something new has to be done.
http://menofthescarletandgray.com
by el Kaiser on Oct 19, 2009 10:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
right
I just watched the third quarter of the Purdue game and couldn’t believe my eyes. After throwing a pick and fumbling while in the pocket, Tressel ordered another dropback pass…He’s not Troy Smith, he doesn’t have a good snap delivery, why is he in the pocket again?
The Rivalry, Esq.
Big Ten Football: 3 Yards and a Cloud of Field Turf
by grahamfiller10 on Oct 19, 2009 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, he's not Troy Smith
He has the potential to be better. But at this point, it’s clear something is not clicking in his brain. The coaching he has received thus far does not seem to be sticking or even making an impression. Until he works out some fundamental issues (problems that would never crop up when you’re surrounded by lesser athletes) he will simply not do as an OSU QB.
by el Kaiser on Oct 19, 2009 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you know what's worse
We graded his mechanics after the Spring Game – and he came out a respectable B+ because we felt he was really snapping the ball on release and had got past the shotput days…
The Rivalry, Esq.
Big Ten Football: 3 Yards and a Cloud of Field Turf
by grahamfiller10 on Oct 19, 2009 11:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It's The Coaches...
I’m not saying that Pryor is blameless. He has had many miscues, but could anyone imagine what Pete Carroll or Urban Meyer (or even RichRod) would be doing with Terrelle Pryor right now? Does anyone honestly think he would playing like this? When you have the talent Ohio State has and underperform year after year, it’s not the players (or should I say it’s only partly the players). 90% of that blame, especially in college football (where player development and short learning curves for the talent you have to develop), rest with the coaches. Yes, I know Tressel won a N.C. seven years ago, but he simply cannot coach an offense. His play calling is suspect at best (and his time clock management a constant issue [along when to figure out to kick a field goal]), and he’s trying to cage the one thing Terrelle does really well, while trying to delude us into thinking he’s a dropback passer. Throw in the maturity issues this young man is experiencing, and you have to wonder where the head coach is at in all of this.
The second problem, and not the least insignificant, is the excuse we have for an offensive line coach, Jim Bollman (who has seconded as the offensive coordinator). It is not an exaggeration to say he is one of the worst coaches in any major successful college football program in the country. His zone blocking schemes are out of the NFL, which depends heavily on quick footwork and an athletic offensive line (things OSU is not known for producing). Yes, college programs use zone blocking, but all of them model their offensive lines on having more athletic, light on the feet linemen. And even when the Buckeyes have had such linemen, or supposed to, Bollman has buzz sawed their productivity (aka, Alex Boone) into un-draftability. Mangold is the last o-lineman that I know of who has been drafted for the OSU in the first few rounds—the same university that gave us Korey Stringer and Orlando Pace in the ’90s alone.
It is kind of hard to have your quarterback develop when he has 2-4 defensive players roaming around in the backfield every time the ball is snapped to him (and it is the main reason why Terrelle runs as much as he does, against the wishes of his coach). Think about the games OSU’s offensive line has been pushed around during the Jim Bollman era. Yes, we were dynamited by Florida and LSU (and had to keep an extra lineman to block at the end of the Texas game last year, when they were rushing three men), but we were pushed around even by lightweight defensive lines like San Diego State and Navy. At some point, it has to occur to people that Jim Bollman cannot reasonably develop the top-of-the-line talent that OSU brings in, and if they do not hold him (as well as the head coach, if necessary) accountable, it will cost the university in recruiting in the near future (as I would never allow any 18 year prospect son of mine, particularly if he were an offensive lineman, to have his talents diminished by the likes of Bollman). That Tressel would retain him is a mark against him as a coach.
Eventually, we have to start looking to where the blame really rests. These players are not getting better, the coaches make terrible calls and decisions (the head coach first among them), and if we continue on this path the road to becoming like Nebraska is not far off.
by tonywf on Oct 20, 2009 10:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I've thought a lot about Bollman this week
And I think Saturday’s performance was an indictment of his performance at the helm. Ohio State has yet to field an outstanding offensive front in the Tressel era. That problem accounts for a significant portion of the troubles we’ve had in recent years.
As you say, even Troy Smith looked mediocre when under regular duress in the 2006 National Championship Game.
I suspect a good test for any General is their willingness to make sacrifices to right the ship. In this case, I think it’s well accepted that someone has to take the fall, and Jim Bollman is the obvious choice.
Will Tressel make the change? I doubt it. It’s an intentional hubris that comes from a lifetime of fidelity to a system. But he should.
Someday I think we’ll look back at this and see a turning point in the Tressel-era. Will Jim go out like Mack Brown will, or like Phillip Fulmer did?
It’ll be interesting to see.
The Rivalry, Esq.
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.
by Law Buckeye on Oct 20, 2009 10:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And That Is Why....
….I would have no problem with taking it out on the head coach. As Woody used to say, everyone is expendable (including and especially himself as the head coach), and the only thing that should be respected is what you can do to win now. If Tressel cannot right the ship, find someone who will. I do not care what happened in 2002. Yes, I was there that season like everyone else. It was magical. But this is not 2002 (and let us be honest, as much as I would hate to admit it, we were helped by a bad call). Part of being a great or even a good coach is adaptability. You have to acclimatize. Keeping someone like Bollman around when I could see as far back as 2003 that he was not doing the job, it helps bring to critical mass the convergence when you begin losing not only to teams that you are supposed to be competitive against in all of your bowls but now even to inferior opponents, as well. I have little doubt in my mind what our offense would be doing with a Brian Kelly at the helm. Until the coaches who refuse to recognize reality understand that their jobs are on the line, they will not force themselves to adapt, and if they refuse then get rid of them. I am loyal to no one person, except my team winning, and that should be the mentality of the athletic department (and if it is not, then we are in for a rude awakening). I know it sounds cruel to a casual fan or those who just worship their team no matter what, but I do accept excuses when I see talented teams like this lose (and when you have several years of ineptitude to give you your mountainous quantifiable consequence of Fulmer II), well, let us just say I think your question has already been answered.
by tonywf on Oct 20, 2009 10:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yup
The thing about criticizing Tressel is that, well, it’s hard to do. If you’re a Buckeye fan, you won a MNC and a bunch of B10 titles with Tres at the helm. If you’re a fan of a midwestern football school, you’ve been beaten by his teams a lot.
But this year some things were obvious from the start – and they haven’t been remedied. The inability to find offensive cohesion via changes, the insistence of keeping TP in the pocket, the insistence of making TP go through his reads…
It’s time for OSU to make (probably minor) changes at some level, whether it’s playcalling, assistance coaches, schemes….Otherwise the USC-esque debacles will continue.
The Rivalry, Esq.
Big Ten Football: 3 Yards and a Cloud of Field Turf
by grahamfiller10 on Oct 21, 2009 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sad but true...
….but this year is the culmination of the descent that started in our bowl game losing streak. I understand they cannot get rid of him, at least not now, especially since he’s beating Michigan every year (which made it easier to get rid of John Cooper), but everyone thought Tommy Tubberville was untouchable too. People for awhile even though Lloyd Carr couldn’t be touched. Anyone can be canned, even Tressel, if he does not learn to adjust (and when that refusal begins the diminution of the team’s competitiveness and ability to win). Seeing how he has handled Pryor, the offense, and his coordinators (never mind the inordinate, almost pedestrian mistakes in clock management and play calling), all of this tells me that he has simply refused to recognize reality.
by tonywf on Oct 21, 2009 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 










