You Must Be California Dreamin' If You Think Greg Jones Deserves Preseason Defensive Player of the Year
Ed Note: I am currently in California (LA to be exact) for the first time...No one told me that a giant gray t shirt gets draped over the city at night...odd
These preseason awards are meaningless and unimportant. However, no stretch of logic points toward Greg Jones being 1) the best defensive player in the Big 10 or even 2) potentially the best defensive player in the Big 10.
Navarro Bowman should have been the PDPOY. But his marijuana incident may have clouded the voters vision. Anyways, let's break down the two backers.
In 2008, Navarro Bowman proved himself to be the Big Ten's best linebacker (Laurinitis is good too, but Bowman is a better one on one tackler). It was an extremely challenging year to be a linebacker in this conference, thanks to the 6-7 NFL caliber running backs and the ever present power run game that helped embarrass supposedly solid defenses (see: Iowa v Wisconsin). Amidst the rubble of off tackle runs, option attacks with Lebron In Cleats, and the Shonn Greene express, Bowman flourished. Numbers:
Penn State Defense
v. Oregon State - 92 rushing yards allowed, Frosh star Jacquizz Rodgers had 22 carries for 99 yards.
v. Wisconsin - 148 rushing yards allowed on 40 carries, PJ Hill with 58, John Clay with 43.
v. Ohio State - 61 rushing yards allowed.
v. Shonn Greene - 28 carries, 117 yards, long run of 14 yards.
v. Javon Ringer - 17 carries, 42 yards rushing.
So obviously Bowman and the PSU defense closed the door on most running games. Further, every single star halfback who got smothered by PSU is gone to the NFL now. Wouldn't it be logical to think that PSU's defense, now with the addition of another All-American in Sean Lee, will definitely not take steps back? Shouldn't these circumstances dictate that Bowman be the the de factor defensive POY until proven otherwise?
Oh but Graham, you might argue, the departure of Aaron Maybin won't give Bowman the protection he had last year. The departure of all the wide receivers and a young O Line will signal a weaker offense, meaning less rest for Bowman. The probation problems will be a distraction to the team and to #18's performance.
I say to you: Just look at Greg Jones and the Spartans in 2008. In every big game save Iowa, MSU got crunched defensively. The stiff arm fest against Ohio State showed that the Capitol One Bowl-bound Spartans didn't have the same level of talent as an OSU or PSU. The Penn State game exhibited those limitations again, as did the early California game when they gave up 38 points and some long runs.
But enough focus on 2008's struggles - If the Spartans improved for 2009, I could see the pick of Jones as PDPOY as being trendy and focused on the potential he holds. However, the Spartans lost their 2nd best defensive player (Otis Wiley) and their offensive stars in Brian Hoyer and Ringer. Sure they play an easier schedule this year, but that shouldn't factor into who is the best defensive player in the conference. Jones is going to find it tougher to succeed with a demanding early schedule and the possibility that the offense will struggle with no experience at the skill positions.
So we have established three things
- Bowman had a monster 2008 year and there are no signs or (I believe) upcoming suspensions that lead us to believe he won't have another one.
- Jones plays for a inferior team that lost just as much talent as Penn State lost.
- The quality of athlete and team talent at Penn State (right now at least) is higher than at MSU.
What happened here? Did the media bow to political correctness and somehow think that a vote for Bowman was a vote for marijuana use? Anyway you look at it, logic was defied in picking Jones as the PDPOY.
0 recs |
12 comments
|
Comments
PSU was a better defensive team
No question there. But that doesn’t make Bowman the better player. Jones and Wiley were really the only good defensive players MSU had, and they can’t make the tackle on every play.
Which one was better? I honestly have no idea. But dismissing Jones because he was surrounded by mild competence at best seems kind of silly.
by SpartanDan on Jul 30, 2009 1:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand this article.
Greg Jones isn’t even “potentially the best defensive player in the Big Ten”?
Jones didn’t have the benefit of cleaning up behind a solid DL and still led the Big Ten in tackles in conference play, but he is undeserving because MSU lost to PSU, OSU, and Georgia? I really don’t see how any stretch of logic can use a team’s defense to judge an individual player, especially when Jones set career highs in tackles and TFLs against PSU and averaged 12.5 tackles in the OSU and Georgia games.
by Stuka on Jul 30, 2009 1:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Um, excuse me....
….sorry to break up the party.
But the Big Ten Defensive POY will be Corey Wootton. With that secondary, Vince Browne on the other end, and a speedy LB corps….QBs will be holding the ball a bit too long, allowing Corey to crush them.
by Chadnudj on Jul 31, 2009 8:14 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought this was an individual award
There are several players that deserve cosideration for the PDPOY. Navarro Bowman would have been just as deserving as Greg Jones. Chadnudj’s pick of Wootton is arguably justified as well.
The issue is your Michigan logic. Two of the “established” points are team related. Now I know if your a linebacker and your D-line sucks then you might struggle a bit more than a LB with a superior line. However it is even more impressive for the LB that can rise above his teams weaknesses and still showcase his talents.
Here is a break down of the two men in question against the some of the same opponents. These are arguably the biggest games for both teams year in and year out as well. Who steps up more in the big ones? You be the judge.
GJ NB
OSU 13 10
Mich. 10 11
Wisc. 13 8
Purdue 12 7
Iowa* 3 4 You call this flourishing?
PSU/M St. 15** 4 Maybe this is flourishing?
Total 127 106
- I believe MSU beat Iowa and Iowa beat PSU (again flourishing?)
- * It should be noted that in their head to head matchup Greg Jones set personal bests in tackles and tackles for a loss (3.5) This is flourishing!! In that same game Mr. Bowman had 4 tackles and well nothing else!!
It stands to reason that Greg Jones deserves the nod in this argument when comparing players not teams. Though I would have been OK had Bowman recieved the nod and Wootton for that matter. They are all great players and will have outstanding seasons.
What have we learned here? Well only one thing for sure, that Mr. Filler does not know the meaning of flourishing at least on an individual level.
Truth be told none of the mentioned players will probably recieve the DPOY which is all about proving yourself on the field this upcoming season and not what you might do this season based on what you did last season.
by Scarlet Fever on Jul 31, 2009 10:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Scarlett, I don't give a damn
The Big Ten DPOY is not an individual award. Ever. You have to be on a top 3 team or an insane NFL prospect. Jones, IMO, is neither. Congratulations to the Indiana defensive player who busts his ass this year – he isn’t winning any awards. We both know this.
Here is an irrefutable point – Tackles don’t determine who is a better player. Bowman proved himself more talented than Jones last year because he delivered vicious knockout hits to quarterbacks and running backs, not to mention the fact that he truly helped shut down Beanie Wells and Javon Ringer. You point out that Greg Jones “outplayed” Navarro Bowman in the MSU-PSU game – Oh he outplayed him to the tune of a 30 point blowout loss. Your logic…dying…Greg Jones had 13 tackles against Wisconsin, while the Badgers ran for almost 300 yards. He made so many tackles because his defensive unit couldn’t get Wisconsin off the field!
The Rivalry, Esq.
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.
by Law Buckeye on Aug 1, 2009 3:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh and
this was grahamfiller10 writing under Law Bucks name because I was too busy to log off his username
The Rivalry, Esq.
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.
by Law Buckeye on Aug 1, 2009 3:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then they ought to call it something else
If the best player is surrounded by 10 incompetents, that doesn’t mean he isn’t the best player. If the award’s really for “standout player on the best defensive team”, then call it that. (Same thing with the Heisman – quit pretending it’s “most outstanding player” and call it what it really is: “best QB/RB on a top 5 team”.)
by SpartanDan on Aug 2, 2009 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ooooooh!
So if Bowman had zero tackles and PSU won all of its games with shutouts then he is the best linebacker? At what point do you think someone should actually stop relying on others to do there work for them? You can not penalize a player for the lack of talent around him period!!! See it is an individual honor therefore what you do as an individual counts more than what someone else on your team does to help the collective effort. This isn’t football by proxy. I know it’s all the rage these days to create new definitions to words but I am a traditionalist and individual means well “acting as a distinct entity”! And team means “a number of persons associated together in work or activity”. So really what you’re advocating is the best defensive unit in the league. In that case I will give you that PSU was the best all around defense in the league last year and with the return of Shawn Lee it should be one of the best if not the best this year.
I know you weren’t the one who came up with the logic or lack there of that determines 99.99% of the so called individual awards. I will concede that in the end you are probably right on the reasoning why a person may win whatever award. However start calling a spade a spade because in my world logic means following definitions not emotions. I’m mean some things in the world are just irrelevant to an issue. It’s like saying my dad is bigger than your dad if we get into a fist fight. It has no bearing on the outcome of the fight. And for the record my dad is bigger than your dad.
So let’s break down the logic of the player of the year award and see what we come up with. Player: “a person who plays a game”. Person: “INDIVIDUAL”!!!! So what the actual definitions are telling us is that a player is a person and a person is and individual and an individual acts as a distinct entity so we can only conclude, logically that any POY awards should be based on what a player accomplishes on his own. Any other way the name of the award needs to be changed.
And just to cover my secondary the definition of IS = to be.
by Scarlet Fever on Aug 1, 2009 10:33 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
. . .

"Do not cheat your team or your teammates. Know your plays. Block. Protect. Add to what we are trying to do."
The Only Colors
by LVS on Aug 1, 2009 11:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Already?
The season hasn’t started yet and we’ve already been placed on notice? This is not good…
The Rivalry, Esq.
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.
by Bama Hawkeye on Aug 3, 2009 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm
“no stretch of logic points toward Greg Jones being 1) the best defensive player in the Big 10 or even 2) potentially the best defensive player in the Big 10”
No stretching here, last season’s statistics sure seem like a logical argument that Jones is one of the best returning defensive players in the Big 10.
“Did the media bow to political correctness and somehow think that a vote for Bowman was a vote for marijuana use?”
No. Marijuana is just a red herring- unless you were dazed and confused while writing this.
“Anyway [sic] you look at it, logic was defied in picking Jones as the PDPOY.”
In your world, apparently only two linebackers (Jones and Bowman) should be considered for PDPOY. Assuming this is irrefutable logic, choosing the guy who made more plays is illogical?
This post was doomed from the beginning. Blame the smog.
by Z.K. on Aug 2, 2009 8:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 










