Breaking the Silence - Ohio State Stands Tall, Falls Short
Admittedly, I've been avoiding the site all day. I suppose I hoped that a voluntary moratorium might help me to be a little less emotional, and a little more insightful.
Yesterday's loss is the second most difficult I've stomached in a lifetime of being an Ohio State fan - the first being 2006's BCS National Championship fall to Florida. I can't say exactly why this is the case, although I think Matt Hinton is right when he describes the plight of the Buckeyes as "an entirely new brand of disappointment."
No, we weren't blown off the face of the earth like we were that chilly night in Glendale. And no, we weren't embarrassed, like we were last September in Los Angeles. Both of those defeats sprang from a basic inability to meet or adapt to our foes. It was a hollow kind of impotence, like being crushed in the wet coils of fear and confusion, a la Shakespeare's Macbeth ("Till Burnam Wood come upon Dunsinane...")
Last night, by contrast, we were the predator. We couldn't have imagined it at the time we kicked off, but after 3 and a half quarters Ohio State established a sort of Napoleonic dominance - a beautiful interlude of time of possession, and field position that pinned the Mighty Trojans back within the shadows of their own goal post, and forced them to face their own mortality.
Certainly this would be our salvation. A smashing triumph of an upset, marked by dominance at the line of scrimmage, and patience in the backfield. We would kill the Giant, not with power, but with patience - tying it to the stake, drenching it with gasoline, and suffocating its will in a bright scarlet inferno.
Sadly, one Terrelle Pryor forgot to bring a matchbook. And one Jim Tressel forgot what he learned on a January night in 2002 in Tempe. After we twice marched to within a yard of the goal line, we dialed up delayed handoffs, and settled for field goals - when quarterback sneaks were the obvious plays. After our defense gifted five second half possessions to our offense in or near USC territory, we couldn't finish the job.

Ironic? Yes. Surprising, no. After all, Los Angeles owns the rights to the Hollywood ending.
Having had the chance to win, and having come up short, we finally have no one to blame but ourselves. And that is where the blame belongs.
Give credit to the Trojans for not letting Ohio Stadium - and the bravest crowd I've ever seen - swallow them alive. When they had the chance to crush our momentum, they did - and that is what makes USC one of the premiere programs of the decade.
Still, I can't help but feeling like the ghost of Woody Hayes - emblemized in bold red letters on the south side of B-Deck - closed his eyes, and for just one moment, turned away from the program he created. After all, as Woody would say, "The only meaningful statistic is number of games won."
Still, since I'm the kind of person who likes to find the good in everything, let me offer a few hopeful thoughts in closing.
1. The Big Ten is not the runt of the BCS.
Ohio State, the best program in the Big Ten over the past decade, played shoulder to shoulder with the best program in the Pac 10 over the past decade. Purdue - a team picked to finish tenth in the Big Ten this season, came within 2 points of upsetting Oregon, one of the perennial three best teams in the Pac 10. If that doesn't say this conference can compete, I don't know what does.
2. Ohio State's defense is better than advertised
If our young, hungry troops - led by Brian Rolle, and a line that has to be considered one of the best in the land keeps it up, there's not a team in this conference that will put up more than 21 points on the Buckeyes. (Granted, we might not have an offense that's capable of matching that total).
3. This wasn't supposed to be our year
As my dad - the voice of reason - pointed out as we were walking to our car after the game, had Ohio State pulled off an upset last night, we would have been eager victims of our own success, forced into the drivers seat of a BCS National Championship run that could have only deprived the sport of a legitimate matchup on January 7th. The true test of this class of athletes should be its ability to grow under a cloud of missed opportunities, and dedication to thrive next season.
Success, after all, is "what you do with what you've got."
Terrelle Pryor should understand that more than anyone.
We will be back. And we will better for this.
For Ohio...
0 recs |
5 comments
|
Comments
Coping
Law Buck: While I can’t identify with the grand stage on which your Buckeyes fell on Saturday, I have felt the sting of epic losses as a Gopher fan. Again, not on quite the same level, but to a die-hard fan, the slap in the face of these types of losses doesn’t sting any less or more based on other people’s rationalities.
People will tell you it’s okay, people will say that OSU wasn’t supposed to win, people will tell you that you are over-reacting, people will tell you that OSU played a great game, that USC is just a better team… don’t listen to them. People like us must cope with these things in our own time, in our own way.
GO BIG TEN!!!
Don't sell yourself short Judge, you're a tremendous slouch.
by jerdogg1 on Sep 14, 2009 7:40 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hinton Agrees With Your Home Crowd Assessment
The home crowd obviously brought it, increasingly so as the game went on, in direct contrast to their team, which was content to try to bring its early success back into the shell, as if running, punting and field position could ward off a USC comeback the way it always does against Purdue or Illinois.
The Rivalry, Esq.
Big Ten Football: 3 Yards and a Cloud of Field Turf
by grahamfiller10 on Sep 14, 2009 7:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I legitimately feel bad for OSU fans right now
Not in that “oh, you poor thing” sort of way, but in that “damn, you boys played a helluva game and had to walk away with an L when you didn’t necessarily deserve it” sort of way.
That being said, I think it’s about time to take off the crown from Sir Pryor’s head. He’s an incredible athlete, sure, but he’s not a good QB yet. Unless the WR is open, he’s not hitting them. Unless the running game is working, Pryor isn’t burning anybody. And while he can outrun just about anybody on any team in the conference, he still shotputs the ball inaccurately.
While OSU could have been more aggressive in playcalling and trying to score, I say Pryor hurt the Buckeyes more than helped them against USC. He’s a liability as a QB.
by imadirtyoldman on Sep 14, 2009 8:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
One of the most rational, thoughtful expositions of what it felt like at that game (and after it) I’ve read. Well done, as always.
On the bright side, despite their resemblance to the Browns’ offense Saturday (Punt, Punt, FG, Punt), the Buckeyes’ offense does have a bright future. Further development by the line, another year under center for Pryor, and what I’m beginning to see as an emerging Brandon Saine all bode well.
As the lyric said before the game, Ohio, Ohio, We’ll win the game or know the reason why. We know the reason why…now it’s a matter of execution and getting better.
Besides, if we play the cards correctly, we may end up with a Rose Bowl rematch. Wouldn’t that be fun?
Courting mediocrity since 1964.
by lakeeriemonstar on Sep 14, 2009 9:19 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
As a sympathetic fellow B10 fan
I have to say that USC didn’t win this game so much as OSU pissed it away (in prime time on national television). OSU has ridiculously gifted athletes on par with any other elite program in the nation, and yet fails, time and again, to utilize them sufficiently. That can only be laid at the feet of the coaching staff.
This game should have been a rout. It was unnecessarily turned into a slugfest by OSU’s complete failure to play to its own strengths.
by rockyh on Sep 15, 2009 3:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 









